Law Vs Logic The Cerebral Conundrum Of The 16th Judicial Circuit Court

Law Vs Logic The Cerebral Conundrum Of The 16th Judicial Circuit Court - Logic, it is said, speaks less as a language than as a code, and is too rigid and inflexible to deal with the. There are many schools of formal logic, but in law the term logic is used informally to mean sound reasoning. So when we say that a judicial opinion is logical we mean that is. Under our system of law, judges are committed to the stare decisis principle that like cases are to be decided similarly, and most judicial opinions accordingly reflect this commitment, either. The main purpose of this paper is to explore the role played by logic in the legal domain. Cashassistancegatewaygagov Client Idpodcast Personal

Logic, it is said, speaks less as a language than as a code, and is too rigid and inflexible to deal with the. There are many schools of formal logic, but in law the term logic is used informally to mean sound reasoning. So when we say that a judicial opinion is logical we mean that is. Under our system of law, judges are committed to the stare decisis principle that like cases are to be decided similarly, and most judicial opinions accordingly reflect this commitment, either. The main purpose of this paper is to explore the role played by logic in the legal domain.

Law Vs Logic The Cerebral Conundrum Of The 16th Judicial Circuit Court